巴菲特银行股翻几倍（重仓银行股）

1、巴菲特喜欢投资银行股吗？

巴菲特有一个简单的投资理念:“欲成非凡之功,未必需做非凡之事。” 巴菲特称自己“从来没见过能够预测股市走势的人”,那么被称为当代最成功投资者的他,采取的是什么样的投资策略呢? “我们的投资仍然是集中于很少几只股票,而且在概念上非常简单:真正伟大的投资理念

2、巴菲特股票资产翻了几千倍，但巴菲特基本买入就一直持有，那来本钱一直买入，还有买入的股票到现在也就最

中国市场没有巴菲特。

3、炒股票一年的收益率百分之多少算高？我想知道一些名人的炒股收益率，例如巴菲特、索罗斯等投资大师的

08之前大牛市高手能翻倍，即100%收益率，08年之后不赔钱就是高手，因为打新股都没保证了。如果你没有涉足股票市场建议你别介入，1赚、2平、7亏是真实写照，赔钱的多，挣钱的少。

4、巴菲特持有的上市公司股票可口可乐的股价翻了多少倍？巴菲特买的时候可口可乐的股价多少，现在多少？

谁能预测出国庆节之前股票的走势

5、请教各位，以银行金融股为重仓股的基金有哪些？

好多呢比如 工银平衡,融通领先华夏蓝畴 都是以招商银行为首席股的.

6、美国这么多银行，为什么巴菲特投资 富国银行？

巴菲特不上百度

7、Mork1990年巴菲特致股东的信为什么买入富国银行

"With Wells Fargo, e think e have obtained the best managers in the business, Carl Reichardt and Paul Hazen. In many ays the bination of Carl and Paul reminds me of another - Tom Murphy and Dan Burke at Capital Cities/ABC. First, each pair is stronger than the sum of its parts because each partner understands, trusts and admires the other. Second, both managerial teams pay able people ell, but abhor having a bigger head count than is needed. Third, both attack costs as vigorously hen profits are at record levels as hen they are under pressure. Finally, both stick ith hat they understand and let their abilities, not their egos, determine hat they attempt. (Thomas J. Watson Sr. of IBM folloed the same rule: "I'm no genius," he said. "I'm smart in spots - but I stay around those spots.")
Our purchases of Wells Fargo in 1990 ere helped by a chaotic market in bank stocks. The disarray as appropriate: Month by month the foolish loan decisions of once ell-regarded banks ere put on public display. As one huge loss after another as unveiled - often on the heels of managerial assurances that all as ell - investors understandably concluded that no bank's numbers ere to be trusted. Aided by their flight from bank stocks, e purchased our 10% interest in Wells Fargo for $290 million, less than five times after-tax earnings, and less than three times pre-tax earnings.
Wells Fargo is big - it has $56 billion in assets - and has been earning more than 20% on equity and 1.25% on assets. Our purchase of one-tenth of the bank may be thought of as roughly equivalent to our buying 100% of a $5 billion bank ith identical financial characteristics. But ere e to make such a purchase, e ould have to pay about tice the $290 million e paid for Wells Fargo. Moreover, that $5 billion bank, manding a premium price, ould present us ith another problem: We ould not be able to find a Carl Reichardt to run it. In recent years, Wells Fargo executives have been more avidly recruited than any others in the banking business; no one, hoever, has been able to hire the dean.
Of course, onership of a bank - or about any other business - is far from riskless. California banks face the specific risk of a major earthquake, hich might reak enough havoc on borroers to in turn destroy the banks lending to them. A second risk is systemic - the possibility of a business contraction or financial panic so severe that it ould endanger almost every highly-leveraged institution, no matter ho intelligently run. Finally, the market's major fear of the moment is that West Coast real estate values ill tumble because of overbuilding and deliver huge losses to banks that have financed the expansion. Because it is a leading real estate lender, Wells Fargo is thought to be particularly vulnerable."
-------BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. Chairman(Warren Buffet)'s Letter